NOT KNOWN FACTS ABOUT BAIL CASE LAW ON SEC 337 A II PPC

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Blog Article

Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by legislation." It is perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the realized counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more

thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed towards the disposal of the moment petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and private respondents and will just take care of each of the aspects of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Law professors traditionally have played a much smaller role in establishing case law in common regulation than professors in civil legislation. Because court decisions in civil legislation traditions are historically brief[four] instead of formally amenable to establishing precedent, much in the exposition in the law in civil regulation traditions is finished by academics rather than by judges; this is called doctrine and should be published in treatises or in journals like Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common regulation courts relied small on legal scholarship; So, for the turn in the twentieth century, it was quite scarce to view an academic writer quoted in a very legal decision (besides Most likely for the educational writings of prominent judges which include Coke and Blackstone).

However it's made apparent that police is free to consider action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also be certain respect of your family drop in accordance with regulation and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security of the house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. 9. Taking into consideration the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is achieved. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated earlier mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that when taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to think about the advantage of every one of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of qualified candidates who're found to generally be most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded from the respondent department just to increase favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part of the respondent department.

The legislation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called law of necessity..

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If your appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 times for the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided via the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.

10. Based on the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition just isn't regarded as maintainable and is particularly therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more

171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is well established now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service framework but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it really is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may possibly if content that a civil servant who was entitled to be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his have, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province while in the click here higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of shell out and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may well request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Report this page